↓ Skip to main content

Kelvin-Helmholtz instability as one of the key features for fast and efficient emulsification by hydrodynamic cavitation

Overview of attention for article published in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Kelvin-Helmholtz instability as one of the key features for fast and efficient emulsification by hydrodynamic cavitation
Published in
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, June 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.106970
Authors

Žan Boček, Martin Petkovšek, Samuel J. Clark, Kamel Fezzaa, Matevž Dular

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,897,855
of 26,206,339 outputs
Outputs from Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
#727
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,178
of 242,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,206,339 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.