You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Polymer-Tethered Quenched Fluorescent Probes for Enhanced Imaging of Tumor-Associated Proteases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACS Sensors, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acssensors.4c00912 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Hadzima, Franco F. Faucher, Kristýna Blažková, Joshua J. Yim, Matteo Guerra, Shiyu Chen, Emily C. Woods, Ki Wan Park, Pavel Šácha, Vladimír Šubr, Libor Kostka, Tomáš Etrych, Pavel Majer, Jan Konvalinka, Matthew Bogyo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 17 | 81% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,835,746
of 26,248,133 outputs
Outputs from ACS Sensors
#240
of 2,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,913
of 169,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Sensors
#4
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,248,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.