You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Effect of Sewage Source on HF183 Risk-Based Threshold Estimation for Recreational Water Quality Management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Microbial Risk Analysis , June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.mran.2024.100315 |
Authors |
Kyle Curtis, Michael Jahne, David Keeling, Raul Gonzalez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,031,352
of 26,213,600 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Risk Analysis
#24
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,267
of 246,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Risk Analysis
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them