The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Specific interaction from different Aβ42 peptide fragments to α7nAChR-A study of molecular dynamics simulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Molecular Modeling, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00894-024-06032-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xvzhi Gao, Yvning Guan, Chuanbo Wang, Mengke Jia, Sajjad Ahmad, Muhammad Fahad Nouman, Hongqi Ai |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
Researcher | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Chemistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,051,079
of 26,210,734 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Modeling
#75
of 915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,316
of 152,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Modeling
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,210,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them