The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Celebrating the registration of 9.000 patients treated with CAR T cells in the EBMT registry: Collection of real-world data in the context of hematopoietic cellular therapies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Haematology, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.beha.2024.101557 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christian Chabannon, Annalisa Ruggeri, Silvia Montoto, Anja van Biezen, Steffie van der Werf, Annemiek Markslag, Isabel Sanchez-Ortega, Rafael de la Camara, Per Ljungman, Mohamad Mohty, Nicolaus Kröger, Ana Sureda, Eoin McGrath, Chiara Bonini, Jurgen Kuball |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 72% |
Scientists | 4 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 80% |
Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 80% |
Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,514,353
of 26,491,397 outputs
Outputs from Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Haematology
#16
of 617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,712
of 297,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Haematology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,491,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them