The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of an X-ray shielding sheet with lower shielding ability to enable both bone mineral density determination and morphological diagnosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part D: Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107219 |
Authors |
Tatsuya Maeda, Hiroaki Hayashi, Miku Ando, Rina Nishigami, Daiki Kobayashi, Takashi Asahara, Sota Goto, Natsumi Kimoto, Kazuki Takegami, Kazuta Yamashita, Kosaku Higashino, Shuichi Murakami, Takeshi Konishi, Motochika Maki |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2024.
All research outputs
#18,039,900
of 26,375,498 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part D: Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements
#387
of 524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,070
of 102,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part D: Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 524 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.