The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the growing and non-growing season in the Dajiuhu subtropical peatland: A five-year measurement using the eddy covariance technique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110135 |
| Authors |
Ziwei Liu, Jiwen Ge, Shiyu Yang, Xue Li, Jing Xiong, Aoxiang Zheng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,200,199
of 26,447,081 outputs
Outputs from Agricultural & Forest Meteorology
#459
of 2,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,393
of 164,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agricultural & Forest Meteorology
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,447,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.