The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of laryngeal hypersensitivity in dysphagia: A scoping review with embedded stakeholder involvement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1460-6984.13085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Chalmers, Fiona Gillies, Sarah Wallace |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,140,285
of 26,549,961 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
#187
of 1,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,878
of 302,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,549,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.