↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: “Dynamic stability of electric power grids: Tracking the interplay of the network structure, transmission losses, and voltage dynamics” [Chaos 32, 053117 (2022)]

Overview of attention for article published in Chaos, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: “Dynamic stability of electric power grids: Tracking the interplay of the network structure, transmission losses, and voltage dynamics” [Chaos 32, 053117 (2022)]
Published in
Chaos, July 2024
DOI 10.1063/5.0221295
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp C. Böttcher, Dirk Witthaut, Leonardo Rydin Gorjão

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,390,447
of 26,248,133 outputs
Outputs from Chaos
#141
of 3,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,773
of 157,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chaos
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,248,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.