The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The activity of early-life gene regulatory elements is hijacked in aging through pervasive AP-1-linked chromatin opening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cmet.2024.06.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ralph Patrick, Marina Naval-Sanchez, Nikita Deshpande, Yifei Huang, Jingyu Zhang, Xiaoli Chen, Ying Yang, Kanupriya Tiwari, Mohammadhossein Esmaeili, Minh Tran, Amin R Mohamed, Binxu Wang, Di Xia, Jun Ma, Jacqueline Bayliss, Kahlia Wong, Michael L Hun, Xuan Sun, Benjamin Cao, Denny L Cottle, Tara Catterall, Hila Barzilai-Tutsch, Robin-Lee Troskie, Zhian Chen, Andrea F Wise, Sheetal Saini, Ye Mon Soe, Snehlata Kumari, Matthew J Sweet, Helen E Thomas, Ian M Smyth, Anne L Fletcher, Konstantin Knoblich, Matthew J Watt, Majid Alhomrani, Walaa Alsanie, Kylie M Quinn, Tobias D Merson, Ann P Chidgey, Sharon D Ricardo, Di Yu, Thierry Jardé, Seth W Cheetham, Christophe Marcelle, Susan K Nilsson, Quan Nguyen, Melanie D White, Christian M Nefzger |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 60% |
| Scientists | 18 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 36% |
| Researcher | 8 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 592. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2024.
All research outputs
#41,764
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#75
of 3,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#612
of 303,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#2
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.