The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Homopolymer switches mediate adaptive mutability in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-024-01777-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hamzeh Kayhanian, William Cross, Suzanne E. M. van der Horst, Panagiotis Barmpoutis, Eszter Lakatos, Giulio Caravagna, Luis Zapata, Arne Van Hoeck, Sjors Middelkamp, Kevin Litchfield, Christopher Steele, William Waddingham, Dominic Patel, Salvatore Milite, Chen Jin, Ann-Marie Baker, Daniel C. Alexander, Khurum Khan, Daniel Hochhauser, Marco Novelli, Benjamin Werner, Ruben van Boxtel, Joris H. Hageman, Julian R. Buissant des Amorie, Josep Linares, Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg, Iris D. Nagtegaal, Miangela M. Laclé, Leon M. G. Moons, Lodewijk A. A. Brosens, Nischalan Pillay, Andrea Sottoriva, Trevor A. Graham, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo, Kai-Keen Shiu, Hugo J. G. Snippert, Marnix Jansen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 25 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 45% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2024.
All research outputs
#346,129
of 26,441,283 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#644
of 7,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,753
of 261,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#15
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,441,283 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.