The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ophthalmic drop waste due to self-imposed use cessation dates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ophthalmology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.06.020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John M Tan, Bo Chen, Daniel Vail, Alexander Barash, Min Jeong Jeon, Azia Williams, Tenkela Williams, Paul A Sidoti, James C Tsai, Louis R Pasquale, Gareth M C Lema |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2024.
All research outputs
#720,664
of 26,372,008 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmology
#202
of 6,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,192
of 206,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmology
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,372,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.