The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Systematic comparison of sequencing-based spatial transcriptomic methods
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Methods, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41592-024-02325-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yue You, Yuting Fu, Lanxiang Li, Zhongmin Zhang, Shikai Jia, Shihong Lu, Wenle Ren, Yifang Liu, Yang Xu, Xiaojing Liu, Fuqing Jiang, Guangdun Peng, Abhishek Sampath Kumar, Matthew E. Ritchie, Xiaodong Liu, Luyi Tian |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 49 | 49% |
Members of the public | 47 | 47% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 21% |
Professor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 19% |
Unknown | 14 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#930,038
of 26,586,231 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,195
of 5,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,697
of 303,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#24
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,586,231 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.