The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Causal inference reveals the dominant role of interannual variability of carbon sinks in complicated environmental-terrestrial ecosystems
|
---|---|
Published in |
Remote Sensing of Environment, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114300 |
Authors |
Chaoya Dang, Zhenfeng Shao, Peng Fu, Qingwei Zhuang, Xiaodi Xu, Jiaxin Qian |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Researcher | 1 | 25% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 25% |
Other | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2024.
All research outputs
#4,268,329
of 26,248,133 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing of Environment
#984
of 3,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#685
of 6,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing of Environment
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,248,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.