↓ Skip to main content

Hiroshima, al-Nakba: Markers of New Hegemonies

Overview of attention for article published in イスラーム世界研究 : Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
<Special Feature "Nakba after Sixty Years: Memories and Histories in Palestine and East Asia"> Hiroshima, al-Nakba: Markers of New Hegemonies
Published in
イスラーム世界研究 : Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies, January 2009
DOI 10.14989/87462
Authors

Rosemary SAYIGH

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,891,905
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from イスラーム世界研究 : Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies
#1
of 52 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,296
of 188,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from イスラーム世界研究 : Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them