The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative analysis of spatial planning systems and policies: Case study of Montenegro, Republic of North Macedonia and Republic of Serbia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Zbornik radova - Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.5937/zrgfub1902005t |
| Authors |
Branka Tošić, Zora Živanović |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 33% |
| Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,896,985
of 26,255,623 outputs
Outputs from Zbornik radova - Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
#2
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,243
of 451,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zbornik radova - Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,255,623 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.