The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of PDMS-Water Partition Coefficients: Implications for Passive Environmental Sampling of Hydrophobic Organic Compounds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1021/es101103x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erica L. DiFilippo, Robert P. Eganhouse |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 200% |
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Argentina | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 1300% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 1150% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 500% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 400% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 350% |
| Other | 21 | 1050% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 1550% |
| Chemistry | 23 | 1150% |
| Engineering | 14 | 700% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 200% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 150% |
| Other | 13 | 650% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,896,985
of 26,255,623 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#10,021
of 21,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,470
of 108,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#64
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,255,623 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.