The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Can a benthic diatom community complement chemical analyses and discriminate between disturbed and undisturbed saline wetland habitats? A study of seven soda pans in Serbia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Wetlands Ecology and Management, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11273-021-09794-9 |
Authors |
Miloš Ćirić, Bojan Gavrilović, Jelena Krizmanić, Biljana P. Dojčinović, Danijela Vidaković |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 33% |
Researcher | 2 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 33% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,902,770
of 26,267,662 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands Ecology and Management
#174
of 656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,945
of 459,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands Ecology and Management
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,267,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 656 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.