The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A novel murine model mimicking male genital Neisseria species infection using Neisseria musculi†
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology of Reproduction, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biolre/ioae100 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily R Bryan, Julia McRae, Vishnu Kumar, Logan K Trim, Toby I Maidment, Jacob A D Tickner, Emma L Sweeney, Elizabeth D Williams, David M Whiley, Kenneth W Beagley |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#2,269,140
of 26,530,858 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Reproduction
#143
of 4,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,719
of 290,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Reproduction
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,530,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,994 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.