The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Seis‐ing up the Super‐ Morrison formation sauropods
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Anatomy, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1111/joa.14108 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
D. Cary Woodruff, Brian D. Curtice, John R. Foster |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 10% |
United States | 6 | 8% |
Japan | 5 | 6% |
Argentina | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
China | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 52 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 67 | 86% |
Scientists | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2024.
All research outputs
#951,363
of 26,799,545 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anatomy
#126
of 2,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,500
of 311,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anatomy
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,799,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.