↓ Skip to main content

Erratum for Misas et al., “Genomic description of acquired fluconazole- and echinocandin-resistance in patients with serial Candida glabrata isolates”

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum for Misas et al., “Genomic description of acquired fluconazole- and echinocandin-resistance in patients with serial Candida glabrata isolates”
Published in
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2024
DOI 10.1128/jcm.00608-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Misas, E. Seagle, E. N. Jenkins, M. Rajeev, S. Hurst, N. S. Nunnally, M. L. Bentz, M. M. Lyman, E. Berkow, L. H. Harrison, W. Schaffner, T. M. Markus, R. Pierce, M. M. Farley, N. A. Chow, S. R. Lockhart, A. P. Litvintseva

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2024.
All research outputs
#845,788
of 26,284,763 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#211
of 14,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,419
of 304,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,284,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.