↓ Skip to main content

Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024
Published in
Quality of Life Research, July 2024
DOI 10.1007/s11136-024-03634-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen B. M. Elsman, Lidwine B. Mokkink, Caroline B. Terwee, Dorcas Beaton, Joel J. Gagnier, Andrea C. Tricco, Ami Baba, Nancy J. Butcher, Maureen Smith, Catherine Hofstetter, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Anna Berardi, Julie Farmer, Kirstie L. Haywood, Karolin R. Krause, Sarah Markham, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Ava Mehdipour, Juanna Ricketts, Peter Szatmari, Zahi Touma, David Moher, Martin Offringa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 9 56%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Psychology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2024.
All research outputs
#2,044,995
of 26,528,445 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#120
of 3,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,232
of 286,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,528,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.