↓ Skip to main content

Portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis, management, and endpoints for future clinical studies

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
178 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis, management, and endpoints for future clinical studies
Published in
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, July 2024
DOI 10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00155-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laure Elkrief, Virginia Hernandez-Gea, Marco Senzolo, Agustin Albillos, Anna Baiges, Annalisa Berzigotti, Christophe Bureau, Sarwa Darwish Murad, Andrea De Gottardi, François Durand, Juan-Carlos Garcia-Pagan, Ton Lisman, Mattias Mandorfer, Valérie McLin, Lucile Moga, Filipe Nery, Patrick Northup, Alexandre Nuzzo, Valérie Paradis, David Patch, Audrey Payancé, Vincent Plaforet, Aurélie Plessier, Johanne Poisson, Lara Roberts, Riad Salem, Shiv Sarin, Akash Shukla, Christian Toso, Dhiraj Tripathi, Dominique Valla, Maxime Ronot, Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou, an EASL consortium ERN RARE-LIVER and VALDIG

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 178 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Unspecified 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2024.
All research outputs
#414,459
of 26,785,907 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#117
of 1,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,662
of 309,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,785,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.