↓ Skip to main content

Localization of protoporphyrin IX during glioma-resection surgery via paired stimulated Raman histology and fluorescence microscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biomedical Engineering, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Localization of protoporphyrin IX during glioma-resection surgery via paired stimulated Raman histology and fluorescence microscopy
Published in
Nature Biomedical Engineering, July 2024
DOI 10.1038/s41551-024-01217-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mustafa Nasir-Moin, Lisa Irina Wadiura, Vlad Sacalean, Devin Juros, Misha Movahed-Ezazi, Emily K. Lock, Andrew Smith, Matthew Lee, Hannah Weiss, Michael Müther, Daniel Alber, Sujay Ratna, Camila Fang, Eric Suero-Molina, Sönke Hellwig, Walter Stummer, Karl Rössler, Johannes A. Hainfellner, Georg Widhalm, Barbara Kiesel, David Reichert, Mario Mischkulnig, Rajan Jain, Jakob Straehle, Nicolas Neidert, Oliver Schnell, Jürgen Beck, Jay Trautman, Steve Pastore, Donato Pacione, Dimitris Placantonakis, Eric Karl Oermann, John G. Golfinos, Todd C. Hollon, Matija Snuderl, Christian W. Freudiger, Dieter Henrik Heiland, Daniel A. Orringer

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Unspecified 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 19%
Engineering 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,116,134
of 26,774,533 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#745
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,135
of 309,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,774,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 79.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.