↓ Skip to main content

北海道西部におけるエゾシカの冬期の食性と積雪の影響

Overview of attention for article published in Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science), July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
北海道西部におけるエゾシカの冬期の食性と積雪の影響
Published in
Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science), July 2011
DOI 10.11238/mammalianscience.51.19
Authors

南野 一博, 明石 信廣

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,914,012
of 26,291,905 outputs
Outputs from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#70
of 415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,321
of 133,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,291,905 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 415 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.