The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Position of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior: The Importance of Emergency-Related Food and Nutrition Education Before, During, and After a Disaster
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.04.008 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sheila Fleischhacker, Uriyoán Colón-Ramos, Lindsey Haynes-Maslow, Lauren Clay |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2024.
All research outputs
#882,631
of 26,521,103 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
#138
of 1,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,674
of 298,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,521,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.