The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 347 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Three-dimensional genome architecture persists in a 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth skin sample
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2024.06.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcela Sandoval-Velasco, Olga Dudchenko, Juan Antonio Rodríguez, Cynthia Pérez Estrada, Marianne Dehasque, Claudia Fontsere, Sarah S T Mak, Ruqayya Khan, Vinícius G Contessoto, Antonio B Oliveira Junior, Achyuth Kalluchi, Bernardo J Zubillaga Herrera, Jiyun Jeong, Renata P Roy, Ishawnia Christopher, David Weisz, Arina D Omer, Sanjit S Batra, Muhammad S Shamim, Neva C Durand, Brendan O'Connell, Alfred L Roca, Maksim V Plikus, Mariya A Kusliy, Svetlana A Romanenko, Natalya A Lemskaya, Natalya A Serdyukova, Svetlana A Modina, Polina L Perelman, Elena A Kizilova, Sergei I Baiborodin, Nikolai B Rubtsov, Gur Machol, Krisha Rath, Ragini Mahajan, Parwinder Kaur, Andreas Gnirke, Isabel Garcia-Treviño, Rob Coke, Joseph P Flanagan, Kelcie Pletch, Aurora Ruiz-Herrera, Valerii Plotnikov, Innokentiy S Pavlov, Naryya I Pavlova, Albert V Protopopov, Michele Di Pierro, Alexander S Graphodatsky, Eric S Lander, M Jordan Rowley, Peter G Wolynes, José N Onuchic, Love Dalén, Marc A Marti-Renom, M Thomas P Gilbert, Erez Lieberman Aiden |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 341 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 240 | 69% |
| Scientists | 102 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 22% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1746. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#6,344
of 26,580,681 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#50
of 17,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111
of 305,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#2
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,580,681 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.