↓ Skip to main content

Nasal sprays and behavioural interventions compared with usual care for acute respiratory illness in primary care: a randomised, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 2,962)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
196 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
143 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nasal sprays and behavioural interventions compared with usual care for acute respiratory illness in primary care: a randomised, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial
Published in
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, July 2024
DOI 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00140-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Little, Jane Vennik, Kate Rumsby, Beth Stuart, Taeko Becque, Michael Moore, Nick Francis, Alastair D Hay, Theo Verheij, Katherine Bradbury, Kate Greenwell, Laura Dennison, Sian Holt, James Denison-Day, Ben Ainsworth, James Raftery, Tammy Thomas, Christopher C Butler, Samantha Richards-Hall, Deb Smith, Hazel Patel, Samantha Williams, Jane Barnett, Karen Middleton, Sascha Miller, Sophie Johnson, Jacqui Nuttall, Fran Webley, Tracey Sach, Lucy Yardley, Adam W A Geraghty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 19 70%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Researcher 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 19 70%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1540. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,003
of 26,552,644 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#29
of 2,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125
of 294,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,552,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 79.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.