The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dried fruit intake and lower risk of type 2 diabetes: a two-sample mendelian randomization study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition & Metabolism, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12986-024-00813-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jianbin Guan, Tao Liu, Kaitan Yang, Hao Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 75 | 93% |
| Scientists | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 399. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#80,681
of 26,579,895 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#19
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,039
of 296,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,579,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.