The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prospecting in-situ resources for future crewed missions to Mars
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Astronautica, October 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.07.003 |
Authors |
Christoph Gross, Muna Al-Samir, Janice L. Bishop, François Poulet, Frank Postberg, Daniel Schubert |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,692,435
of 26,320,509 outputs
Outputs from Acta Astronautica
#266
of 2,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148
of 6,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Astronautica
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,320,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them