The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous dinosaur track assemblages from northwestern Hebei Province, China: Implications for paleoenvironment and paleoecology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cretaceous Research, November 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cretres.2024.105960 |
| Authors |
Tingyuan Yuan, Huan Xu, Xiaojun Jiang, Yongqing Liu, Hongwei Kuang, Nan Peng, Jun Chen, Chao Cen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,612,955
of 26,567,854 outputs
Outputs from Cretaceous Research
#729
of 2,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,668
of 7,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cretaceous Research
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,567,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.