The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Taxonomic resolution of the hillstream suck-loach Beaufortia pingi species group (Cypriniformes, Gastromyzontidae) and two new species from Southwest China– Beaufortia granulopinna and Beaufortia viridis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Zoosystematics and Evolution, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3897/zse.100.124370 |
| Authors |
Jing-Chen Chen, Jia-Jia Li, Wen-Qiao Tang, Xin-Rui Pu, Hao-Tian Lei |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 89% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 257. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2024.
All research outputs
#152,371
of 26,565,554 outputs
Outputs from Zoosystematics and Evolution
#18
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,819
of 296,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoosystematics and Evolution
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,565,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.