The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A NSC‐34 cell line‐derived spheroid model: Potential and challenges for in vitro evaluation of neurodegeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microscopy Research and Technique, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jemt.24651 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pietro Arnaldi, Elena Casarotto, Michela Relucenti, Grazia Bellese, Maria Cristina Gagliani, Valeria Crippa, Patrizio Castagnola, Katia Cortese |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,074,679
of 26,310,456 outputs
Outputs from Microscopy Research and Technique
#88
of 1,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,893
of 152,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microscopy Research and Technique
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,310,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them