↓ Skip to main content

Collective Knowledge and the Limits of the Expanded Identification Doctrine

Overview of attention for article published in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Collective Knowledge and the Limits of the Expanded Identification Doctrine
Published in
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, July 2024
DOI 10.1093/ojls/gqae025
Authors

Alexander Sarch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2024.
All research outputs
#6,948,701
of 26,588,416 outputs
Outputs from Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
#146
of 472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,064
of 296,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.