The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pollen identification of three notorious illicit drug plants and its potential applications in forensic practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Forensic Sciences (Blackwell Publishing Limited), July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1556-4029.15581 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi‐Ming Wu, Li‐Li Lu, Gan Xie, David Kay Ferguson, Hong‐Ling Guo, Yu‐Fei Wang, Jin‐Feng Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,634,394
of 26,588,416 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Forensic Sciences (Blackwell Publishing Limited)
#981
of 3,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,079
of 297,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Forensic Sciences (Blackwell Publishing Limited)
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.