The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding the Decamethylferrocene FeIII/IV Oxidation Process in Tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate-Containing Ionic Liquids at Glassy Carbon and Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Inorganic Chemistry, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c01932 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miguel A. Gonzalvez, Luke Gundry, Laura Garcia-Quintana, Si-Xuan Guo, Alan M. Bond, Jie Zhang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 79% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2024.
All research outputs
#6,650,819
of 26,491,309 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#3,224
of 24,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,692
of 258,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#44
of 370 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,491,309 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 370 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.