The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Beyond fentanyl test Strips: Investigating other urine drug test strips for drug checking applications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Forensic Chemistry, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.forc.2024.100594 |
Authors |
Edward Sisco, Meghan G. Appley, Elise M. Pyfrom, Caleb J. Banta-Green, Chelsea L. Shover, Caitlin A. Molina, Ben Biamont, Elizabeth L. Robinson |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,046,157
of 26,332,460 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Chemistry
#12
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151
of 9,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Chemistry
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,332,460 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them