The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A global perspective on the status of clinical metabolomics in laboratory medicine – a survey by the IFCC metabolomics working group
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1515/cclm-2024-0550 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elie Fux, Marie Lenski, Anne K. Bendt, James D. Otvos, Julijana Ivanisevic, Sander De Bruyne, Etienne Cavalier, David Friedecký |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Czechia | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#15,705,819
of 26,327,128 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
#1,034
of 3,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,927
of 208,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
#4
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,327,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.