The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 180 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bee pollination in the shadows: The role of pseudopollen and agamospermy in the mycoheterotrophic orchid Gastrodia elata
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ppp3.10540 |
| Authors |
Kenji Suetsugu, Takenori Yamamoto |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 3% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 176 | 98% |
| Scientists | 3 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#363,382
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
#38
of 510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,220
of 274,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.