You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Albuterol–budesonide rescue reduces progression from asthma deterioration to severe exacerbation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.06.037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bradley E Chipps, Alberto Papi, Richard Beasley, Elliot Israel, Reynold A Panettieri, Frank C Albers, Mark Cooper, Patrick Darken, Ileen Gilbert, Frank Trudo, Mark Weinberg, Christy Cappelletti |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,132,078
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#1,413
of 4,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,590
of 300,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#10
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.