The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
KT-Biologics I (KTB1): A dynamic simulation model for continuous biologics manufacturing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Computers & Chemical Engineering, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108770 |
Authors |
Mohammad Reza Boskabadi, Pedram Ramin, Julian Kager, Gürkan Sin, Seyed Soheil Mansouri |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 33% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 33% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,081,595
of 26,335,402 outputs
Outputs from Computers & Chemical Engineering
#53
of 1,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,201
of 9,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computers & Chemical Engineering
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,335,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,015 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them