The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Suppression of viral rebound by a Rev-dependent lentiviral particle in SIV-infected rhesus macaques
|
---|---|
Published in |
Gene Therapy, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41434-024-00467-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brian Hetrick, Summer Siddiqui, Mark Spear, Jia Guo, Huizhi Liang, Yajing Fu, Zhijun Yang, Lara Doyle-Meyers, Bapi Pahar, Ronald S. Veazey, Jason Dufour, Ali Andalibi, Binhua Ling, Yuntao Wu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Uganda | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2024.
All research outputs
#539,902
of 26,563,001 outputs
Outputs from Gene Therapy
#24
of 3,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,594
of 280,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gene Therapy
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.