The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Productive Explanation: A Framework for Evaluating Explanations in Psychological Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Review, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1037/rev0000479 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noah van Dongen, Riet van Bork, Adam Finnemann, Jonas M. B. Haslbeck, Han L. J. van der Maas, Donald J. Robinaugh, Jill de Ron, Jan Sprenger, Denny Borsboom |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 70% |
| Scientists | 17 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 35% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 47% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,227,091
of 26,588,416 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Review
#165
of 1,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,115
of 286,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Review
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.