The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the effect of APOE ε4 on biomarkers of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinica Chimica Acta, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119876 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luisa Agnello, Caterina Maria Gambino, Anna Maria Ciaccio, Tommaso Piccoli, Valeria Blandino, Concetta Scazzone, Bruna Lo Sasso, Fabio Del Ben, Marcello Ciaccio |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
| Researcher | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,104,627
of 26,383,299 outputs
Outputs from Clinica Chimica Acta
#426
of 4,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,616
of 151,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinica Chimica Acta
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,993 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.