The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Harnessing Cu incorporation for achieving stable superior microwave dielectric properties in low permittivity MgSiO3-based ceramics through effective phase transition suppression
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ceramics International, October 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.201 |
Authors |
Jin Fang, Tao Ni, Minmin Mao, Yu Liu, Huan Liu, Lei Cao, Xueqing Yu, Bing Liu, Hadi Barzegar Bafrooei, Liang He, Yingjie Ren, Fayaz Hussain, Dawei Wang, Kaixin Song |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pakistan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2024.
All research outputs
#18,202,031
of 26,626,316 outputs
Outputs from Ceramics International
#1,984
of 2,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,421
of 79,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ceramics International
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,626,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,935 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.