The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Middle Triassic basaltic pyroclastic rocks from the Mt. Medvednica ophiolitic mélange (NW Croatia): petrology, geochemistry and tectono-magmatic setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geologia Croatica, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.4154/gc.2024.06 |
| Authors |
Damir Slovenec, Zagreb Croatian Geological Survey, Josip Halamić, Branimir Šegvić, Texas Tech University Department of Geosciences |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#16,200,236
of 26,372,509 outputs
Outputs from Geologia Croatica
#21
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,209
of 259,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geologia Croatica
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,372,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them