The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 195 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Click editing enables programmable genome writing using DNA polymerases and HUH endonucleases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41587-024-02324-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joana Ferreira da Silva, Connor J. Tou, Emily M. King, Madeline L. Eller, David Rufino-Ramos, Linyuan Ma, Christopher R. Cromwell, Jasna Metovic, Friederike M. C. Benning, Luke H. Chao, Florian S. Eichler, Benjamin P. Kleinstiver |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 97 | 50% |
| Scientists | 85 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 26 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 35% |
| Unspecified | 27 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2024.
All research outputs
#377,324
of 26,579,895 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#846
of 8,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,322
of 272,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#6
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,579,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.