↓ Skip to main content

Biological soliton in multicellular movement

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological soliton in multicellular movement
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep02272
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hidekazu Kuwayama, Shuji Ishida

Abstract

Solitons have been observed in various physical phenomena. Here, we show that the distinct characteristics of solitons are present in the mass cell movement of non-chemotactic mutants of the cellular slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum. During starvation, D. discoideum forms multicellular structures that differentiate into spore or stalk cells and, eventually, a fruiting body. Non-chemotactic mutant cells do not form multicellular structures; however, they do undergo mass cell movement in the form of a pulsatile soliton-like structure (SLS). We also found that SLS induction is mediated by adhesive cell-cell interactions. These observations provide novel insights into the mechanisms of biological solitons in multicellular movement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 6%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 50 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor 5 9%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 17 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 22%
Engineering 5 9%
Mathematics 4 7%
Computer Science 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,678,780
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#36,084
of 122,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,989
of 198,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#166
of 564 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 564 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.