You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
DPYD Genotyping Recommendations: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, College of American Pathologists, Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group of the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association, European Society for Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Therapy, Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase, and Pharmacogene Variation Consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.05.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria M Pratt, Larisa H Cavallari, Makenzie L Fulmer, Andrea Gaedigk, Houda Hachad, Yuan Ji, Lisa V Kalman, Reynold C Ly, Ann M Moyer, Stuart A Scott, Amy J Turner, Ron H N van Schaik, Michelle Whirl-Carrillo, Karen E Weck |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,224,623
of 26,558,362 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
#144
of 1,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,435
of 274,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,362 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.