↓ Skip to main content

Trophoblast Side-Population Markers are Dysregulated in Preeclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trophoblast Side-Population Markers are Dysregulated in Preeclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction
Published in
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, July 2024
DOI 10.1007/s12015-024-10764-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgia P. Wong, Sunhild Hartmann, David G. Simmons, Sarah Ellis, Olivia Nonn, Ping Cannon, Tuong-Vi Nguyen, Anna Nguyen, Lucy A. Bartho, Stephen Tong, Natalie J. Hannan, Tu’uhevaha J. Kaitu’u-Lino

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#4,481,563
of 26,365,186 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#166
of 1,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,156
of 154,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,365,186 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.